Epsom and Ewell Times
22nd October 2026

ISSN, LDRS and IMPRESS logos

Surrey to support nature activity for health

Group of middle aged walking in woods

A new countywide programme has been launched to help more Surrey residents improve their health and wellbeing through spending time in nature.

Surrey County Council has launched the Surrey Green Health and Wellbeing Programme in partnership with the Community Foundation for Surrey. Backed by a £170,000 investment, the programme will support voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) organisations that provide nature-based activities and services across the county.

The programme which forms part of SCC’s work to improve health and wellbeing, strengthen communities and help prevent poor health was officially launched on Wednesday 7 October at an event bringing together organisations from across Surrey to share ideas, make new connections and find out more about the support available through the programme.

Across Surrey, organisations already deliver activities such as community gardening, conservation volunteering, walking groups and outdoor wellbeing sessions. The new programme will help these organisations grow, work together and reach more people. More information on existing services is available on the Healthy Surrey website.

Mark Nuti, Surrey County Council Cabinet Member for Health and Communities, said: “We know that spending time in nature can have a positive impact on both physical and mental wellbeing. Across Surrey, local organisations are already doing fantastic work to help people connect with nature and improve their health.”

“This new programme will help strengthen those organisations, encourage greater collaboration and ensure more residents can access the benefits that Green Health can provide. By investing in community-led solutions, we’re helping to create healthier communities and a stronger, more connected Green Health network across Surrey.”

The Community Foundation for Surrey will manage the new Green Health and Wellbeing Grant Fund, providing financial support to eligible VCSE organisations. The programme will also create a Surrey-wide Community of Practice, bringing organisations together through workshops, networking and shared learning opportunities.

Beccy Bowden, Chief Executive of Community Foundation for Surrey, said: “We are delighted to launch this new fund in partnership with Surrey County Council, helping more people across Surrey benefit from the positive impact nature can have on health and wellbeing. Together, we want to support local organisations to extend this important work, helping more residents connect with nature and access the benefits of green and blue spaces.”

“By working alongside Surrey County Council and community partners, we can help improve health and wellbeing while strengthening people’s connection with the natural environment around them.”

The programme includes:

  • A dedicated Green Health and Wellbeing Grant Fund for eligible VCSE organisations
  • A Surrey-wide Community of Practice for organisations working in green health
  • Workshops, networking events and opportunities to share learning
  • Collaboration with partners to help shape the future of green health in Surrey

Information about grant funding opportunities and how organisations can get involved will be shared through Surrey County Council and Community Foundation for Surrey channels.

Surrey County Council


Surrey seeks more families to open their homes to children in care

Foster parents welcoming a new charge. Idealised.

Surrey residents are being urged not to rule themselves out as potential foster carers as the county seeks more local homes for children and young people who cannot live with their birth families.

Surrey Fostering Service says misconceptions about age, employment, income, home ownership and family circumstances can deter people who might otherwise make excellent foster carers.

The appeal comes as the Government launches a national drive intended to create 10,000 additional foster care places in England by the end of this Parliament. The campaign, launched at Downing Street on 13 October, is particularly seeking to reach adults in their 30s and 40s who may have the capacity to foster but have never seriously considered doing so.

Surrey County Council approached the Epsom and Ewell Times saying there was a “growing need for foster carers across Surrey”. It said many people who believe they might make good carers nevertheless eliminate themselves because of mistaken assumptions about who is eligible.

The council says fostering families can come from many different backgrounds and that what children most need is “stability, encouragement and care”.

Fewer fostering households

The need is borne out by Surrey’s own figures.

The number of fostering households in the county stood at 393 in March 2020. By March 2024 it had fallen to 331, before recovering only slightly to 335 in March 2025. The corresponding number of fostering places fell from 656 in 2020 to 574 in 2025.

Surrey’s 2025-28 sufficiency strategy acknowledges that the council has experienced a loss of its own foster carers, reflecting a national problem. In March 2024, 644 Surrey children in care – 66 per cent – were living in general or kinship fostering arrangements. But 43 per cent of those in foster care were living with independent fostering agencies rather than Surrey’s own service.

The consequences of a shortage can extend beyond administrative inconvenience.

In January this year Surrey reported that 38 per cent of its 350 looked-after children were living more than 20 miles from their home address and outside the county. The council said it could not always find placements locally which met children’s needs.

Being able to remain near school, friends, relatives and established support networks can be particularly important for children whose lives have already been disrupted.

From respite care to a permanent place in the family

Surrey has sought to put human stories behind those figures.

One of the foster carers highlighted to EET is Ben. He originally offered respite care – providing a child with somewhere to stay for shorter periods – but that relationship eventually developed into a long-term placement.

The young person remained part of Ben’s household into adulthood and has recently passed their driving test. Surrey says Ben’s story demonstrates how fostering can begin with a comparatively modest commitment to help and develop into a lasting relationship. Surrey Needs More Foster Carers Surrey Needs More Foster Carers

The council’s current collection of fostering stories also includes foster carers from markedly different backgrounds and people offering different kinds of care. Its online material ranges from carers looking after teenagers and young refugees to short-break carers, kinship carers and households supporting neurodivergent young people. Linktree

One care-experienced young person, writing under the name “Thomas”, described moving between four placements in six years and the importance of finally feeling that a foster home offered belonging as well as simply somewhere to live.

For Thomas, “home” was not merely a physical address but somewhere a young person felt safe, wanted and cared for. His account also describes the fear that can remain after repeated placement changes – even when a later placement is going well.

Another Surrey foster carer, Fatima, and her husband have spent almost a decade fostering young asylum seekers.

Their foster sons have included young people from Iran, Eritrea, Sudan and Somalia. One stayed with the family for nearly five years before moving into his own accommodation at 21; another is now married and remains in contact with the family.

Fatima describes the experience as enriching their own wider family as well as providing sanctuary for young people who have fled persecution and war.

Surrey’s fostering service has also recently published the experience of a neurodivergent foster carer who describes using unconventional approaches to help young people overcome barriers. In one case, a child disengaged from conventional schooling but interested in carpentry was helped into a combination of school and practical carpentry training, with maths and English incorporated into the work.

You do not have to fit a traditional mould

Government guidance confirms that potential carers do not have to own their home and may be able to continue working.

Applicants must be at least 18, although most fostering services require carers to be at least 21. They must be able to care for a child or young person and normally need a spare bedroom. Applicants undergo assessment and checks before approval.

The Department for Education says the number of approved foster carers in England has fallen by almost 12 per cent over the past decade while the number of children in care has increased.

It is specifically trying to dispel the assumption that foster carers must be married, own their homes or give up employment.

Surrey’s recruitment performance has shown some improvement. During 2025/26 it received hundreds of initial enquiries and reported increased numbers progressing to home visits. Thirty fostering households had already been approved at the point of a council report earlier this year, with further applicants due before fostering panels.

But that recruitment has to compensate not only for additional demand but also for experienced foster carers retiring or leaving the service.

Surrey Fostering Service is therefore asking residents who have wondered whether they could foster to speak to the team rather than assuming that their circumstances exclude them.

As its message to potential carers puts it: “What if you are exactly what a Surrey child needs?” Surrey Needs More Foster Carers

More information about fostering and making an enquiry is available through Surrey County Council’s fostering service. The recruitment team can also be contacted on 01372 832929.

Surrey seeks more families to open their homes to children in care

Surrey residents are being urged not to rule themselves out as potential foster carers as the county seeks more local homes for children and young people who cannot live with their birth families.

Surrey Fostering Service says misconceptions about age, employment, income, home ownership and family circumstances can deter people who might otherwise make excellent foster carers.

The appeal comes as the Government launches a national drive intended to create 10,000 additional foster care places in England by the end of this Parliament. The campaign, launched at Downing Street on 13 October, is particularly seeking to reach adults in their 30s and 40s who may have the capacity to foster but have never seriously considered doing so.

Surrey County Council approached the Epsom and Ewell Times saying there was a “growing need for foster carers across Surrey”. It said many people who believe they might make good carers nevertheless eliminate themselves because of mistaken assumptions about who is eligible. Surrey Needs More Foster Carers

The council says fostering families can come from many different backgrounds and that what children most need is “stability, encouragement and care”. Surrey Needs More Foster Carers

Fewer fostering households

The need is borne out by Surrey’s own figures.

The number of fostering households in the county stood at 393 in March 2020. By March 2024 it had fallen to 331, before recovering only slightly to 335 in March 2025. The corresponding number of fostering places fell from 656 in 2020 to 574 in 2025.

Surrey’s 2025-28 sufficiency strategy acknowledges that the council has experienced a loss of its own foster carers, reflecting a national problem. In March 2024, 644 Surrey children in care – 66 per cent – were living in general or kinship fostering arrangements. But 43 per cent of those in foster care were living with independent fostering agencies rather than Surrey’s own service.

The consequences of a shortage can extend beyond administrative inconvenience.

In January this year Surrey reported that 38 per cent of its 350 looked-after children were living more than 20 miles from their home address and outside the county. The council said it could not always find placements locally which met children’s needs.

Being able to remain near school, friends, relatives and established support networks can be particularly important for children whose lives have already been disrupted.

From respite care to a permanent place in the family

Surrey has sought to put human stories behind those figures.

One of the foster carers highlighted to EET is Ben. He originally offered respite care – providing a child with somewhere to stay for shorter periods – but that relationship eventually developed into a long-term placement.

The young person remained part of Ben’s household into adulthood and has recently passed their driving test. Surrey says Ben’s story demonstrates how fostering can begin with a comparatively modest commitment to help and develop into a lasting relationship.

The council’s current collection of fostering stories also includes foster carers from markedly different backgrounds and people offering different kinds of care. Its online material ranges from carers looking after teenagers and young refugees to short-break carers, kinship carers and households supporting neurodivergent young people.

One care-experienced young person, writing under the name “Thomas”, described moving between four placements in six years and the importance of finally feeling that a foster home offered belonging as well as simply somewhere to live.

For Thomas, “home” was not merely a physical address but somewhere a young person felt safe, wanted and cared for. His account also describes the fear that can remain after repeated placement changes – even when a later placement is going well.

Another Surrey foster carer, Fatima, and her husband have spent almost a decade fostering young asylum seekers.

Their foster sons have included young people from Iran, Eritrea, Sudan and Somalia. One stayed with the family for nearly five years before moving into his own accommodation at 21; another is now married and remains in contact with the family.

Fatima describes the experience as enriching their own wider family as well as providing sanctuary for young people who have fled persecution and war.

Surrey’s fostering service has also recently published the experience of a neurodivergent foster carer who describes using unconventional approaches to help young people overcome barriers. In one case, a child disengaged from conventional schooling but interested in carpentry was helped into a combination of school and practical carpentry training, with maths and English incorporated into the work.

You do not have to fit a traditional mould

Government guidance confirms that potential carers do not have to own their home and may be able to continue working.

Applicants must be at least 18, although most fostering services require carers to be at least 21. They must be able to care for a child or young person and normally need a spare bedroom. Applicants undergo assessment and checks before approval.

The Department for Education says the number of approved foster carers in England has fallen by almost 12 per cent over the past decade while the number of children in care has increased.

It is specifically trying to dispel the assumption that foster carers must be married, own their homes or give up employment.

Surrey’s recruitment performance has shown some improvement. During 2025/26 it received hundreds of initial enquiries and reported increased numbers progressing to home visits. Thirty fostering households had already been approved at the point of a council report earlier this year, with further applicants due before fostering panels.

But that recruitment has to compensate not only for additional demand but also for experienced foster carers retiring or leaving the service.

Surrey Fostering Service is therefore asking residents who have wondered whether they could foster to speak to the team rather than assuming that their circumstances exclude them.

As its message to potential carers puts it: “What if you are exactly what a Surrey child needs?” Surrey Needs More Foster Carers

More information about fostering and making an enquiry is available through Surrey County Council’s fostering service. The recruitment team can also be contacted on 01372 832929.

Lionel Blackman

.

Related reports:


Epsom Hospital added to app helping visually impaired bus users

Idealised representation of app user at a bus stop near Epsom Hospital

Epsom Hospital has been added to a Surrey scheme using smartphone technology to help blind and partially sighted people travel more independently by public transport.

Surrey County Council has expanded free access to the Aira Explorer app to 13 hospitals and healthcare sites across the county, including Epsom Hospital.

The move follows earlier stages of the scheme reported by the Epsom & Ewell Times. Surrey became the first UK local authority to introduce the service at bus stations in June 2025, before it was subsequently extended to Epsom Station and other rail and bus interchanges later that year.

A helping eye on the journey

Aira Explorer allows a visually impaired traveller to make a video call from their smartphone to a trained visual interpreter.

The interpreter can see through the phone’s camera and give spoken guidance to the user. At the newly included healthcare locations, the service is intended to help people navigate between nearby bus stops and hospital entrances.

Use of the app at the designated Surrey locations is free, with the scheme funded by Surrey County Council from its allocation under the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Fund.

Alongside Epsom Hospital, the healthcare locations covered are Royal Surrey County Hospital, Frimley Park Hospital, Ashford Hospital, St Peter’s Hospital, East Surrey Hospital, Farnham Hospital, Woking Community Hospital, Molesey Hospital, Walton Community Hospital, Sunbury Health Centre, Leatherhead Community Hospital and Cranleigh Village Hospital.

The app also remains available at major bus stations and interchanges in Guildford, Redhill, Staines and Woking and at bus stops serving railway stations including Epsom, Caterham, Dorking, Oxted, Leatherhead, Reigate and Horley.

From Epsom Station to Epsom Hospital

EET reported in June 2025 on the introduction of Aira at Guildford, Redhill, Staines and Woking bus stations.

The scheme was expanded later in the year, with Epsom Station among the locations added. The latest development therefore extends the same type of assistance to another important destination for local residents.

Cllr Matt Furniss, Surrey County Council Cabinet Member for Highways, Transport and Economic Growth, said the council was aware that using buses and navigating transport facilities could be difficult for people with visual impairments.

He said the hospital expansion was designed to assist passengers travelling by bus for important appointments and added: “We’re keen to make bus travel accessible for everyone and hope this expansion will support people to travel confidently and independently.”

The council says the initiative forms part of wider spending on bus services, including £6.3 million for additional ultra-low and zero-emission community transport minibuses, £9 million for bus priority measures and £1.4 million for improved passenger information at bus stops.

Disability groups welcome expansion

Nikki Roberts, chief executive of Surrey Coalition of Disabled People, welcomed the extension, saying free access to the service at key locations would be “hugely beneficial” to members with sight loss travelling around Surrey.

Dave Smith, Engagement Manager for South East England at sight-loss charity Thomas Pocklington Trust, said the app was particularly useful if a traveller became disorientated or encountered unexpected roadworks or obstructions.

Clare Burgess, chief executive of Sensory Services by Sight for Surrey, also welcomed the expansion, describing Aira as a useful tool for blind and partially sighted people travelling around the county.

Related reports

Image: Idealised representation of app user at a bus stop near Epsom Hospital


Epsom Mental Health Week marks 20 years of local charity

Flyer for week

Epsom Mental Health Week will bring talks, exercise classes, creative activities and opportunities to meet others to venues across the town from Saturday 3 to Sunday 11 October.

The programme celebrates 20 years of Epsom charity Love Me Love My Mind. Working with the White House Wellness and Health Centre and other local organisations, it aims to make conversations about mental health welcoming and accessible to people of different ages and interests.

Events include a free children’s art club, men’s social walks on Epsom Downs, mindful colouring and tea, yoga and fitness classes, and talks on anxiety, burnout and domestic abuse. St Barnabas Church will host peer support sessions, an advice café and a performance by Epsom Male Voice Choir.

On Wednesday 7 October, Epsom Picturehouse will screen Aftersun, followed by a discussion of the film’s themes of grief, memory and mental health. Tickets must be booked through the Picturehouse website.

The week’s main gathering falls on World Mental Health Day, Saturday 10 October. A Wellness Day at Metropolis Epsom, 1 Derby Square, will run from 11am to 4pm, bringing together local support organisations and offering taster sessions. A free children’s art and craft club will run there from 11am to 3pm.

Activities also take place at the White House Wellness and Health Centre in Waterloo Road, the Rainbow Leisure Centre in East Street and St Barnabas Church in Temple Road. The programme says events are free unless a listing states otherwise. Visitors should check individual booking details and contact the organiser about any accessibility requirements.

A further creative session for children aged seven and over is listed for Wednesday 28 October at Epsom and Ewell Family Centre, Riverview Road, West Ewell. Families can ask about that session on 01372 571178 or at epsomewellfamilycentre@barnardos.org.uk.

For the full programme and enquiries about Epsom Mental Health Week, contact Love Me Love My Mind at info@lovemelovemymind.org.uk or visit lovemelovemymind.org.uk.

Lionel Blackman

.

Related reports


Epsom & Ewell residents invited to share ‘Messages of Hope’ for World Suicide Prevention Day

Epsom Picture House

Epsom & Ewell Borough Council is inviting residents to share messages of encouragement and support as part of the Messages of Hope campaign, marking World Suicide Prevention Day on 10 September.

Part of the council’s Health and Wellbeing Strategy, the initiative aims to help people feel connected, reduce the stigma around mental health, raise awareness of local support services and resources, and provide messages of hope to people who may be facing mental health challenges or affected by the loss of someone to suicide.

Messages of Hope display boards will be located at several locations across the borough. Residents are invited to write a message of hope for others and read or take a message that resonates with them. Information about local mental health support services and resources will be available at each location.

From 10 to 17 September, residents can write a message of hope and pin it to one of the boards located at:

  • Ashley Centre, Epsom
  • Bourne Hall Library, Ewell
  • Epsom Library
  • Epsom Picturehouse
  • St John’s Church, Stoneleigh

Chief Executive of Epsom & Ewell Borough Council, Jackie King, Chair of the Community & Wellbeing Committee, Councillor Clive Woodbridge, and the Mayor of Epsom & Ewell, Councillor Lucie McIntyre, will add their own messages to the board at the Ashley Centre on 10 September.

Epsom Picturehouse will host a free Letters of Hope workshop in its café area on 10 September from 2pm to 4pm, led by local facilitator Kate McBarron. Participants will be guided through letter-writing techniques and prompts to help them create messages of hope, with time afterwards to continue writing. To book a place, email epsom.marketing@picturehouses.co.uk or call 07841 724938.

Councillor Clive Woodbridge, Chair of the Community and Wellbeing Committee said: “Mental health challenges can affect anyone, and they can have a profound impact on individuals, families and friends.

“World Suicide Prevention Day is an opportunity to raise awareness, encourage conversations and remind people that small acts of kindness can make a real difference. Through Messages of Hope, we want to show that Epsom & Ewell is a community that cares, where people look out for one another and where nobody has to face difficult times alone.”

“I would encourage anyone who is experiencing mental health difficulties, or who is concerned about someone they know, to reach out for help. One life lost is too much.”

Information about local mental health support and resources can be found here: Mental Health Support and Resources | Epsom and Ewell Borough Council  

About the EEBC Messages of Hope campaign

The Message of Hope campaign aims to create moments of human connection, reduce stigma around emotional wellbeing, and provide accessible messages of hope to anyone who may be struggling. This campaign does not replace professional support; it complements existing suicide prevention efforts by creating opportunities for compassion, conversation, and hope across the borough.

About Epsom’s Picturehouse free letter-writing technique workshop, supported by EEBC

Epsom’s Picturehouse cinema in Epsom Square will be opening its café space for a free Letters of Hope workshop on September 10th, led by local facilitator Kate McBarron. Kate will lead an hour of guided letter-writing techniques, prompts and inspiration from 2pm, followed by time for participants to continue writing and use the resources provided.

About the EEBC Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2025-2028

The strategy supports all residents, with particular attention given to children and young people, older adults, individuals whose health is affected by broader social and economic factors and those whose personal circumstances may disproportionately increase their vulnerability to poor health and wellbeing. The strategy also includes specific references to those who are disproportionately impacted by isolation, disability, digital exclusion and people with long-term health conditions. (Public Pack) Agenda Document for Community and Wellbeing Committee, 08/07/2025 19:30

Epsom and Ewell Borough Council


Surrey health literacy warning

A doctor stock image (Credit: Pixabay

Nearly one in three working-age Surrey residents is not adequately health literate, a council committee report has warned.

The report, which is due to be considered at a joint meeting of Surrey’s Health and Wellbeing Board and Integrated Care Partnership next week, states that low levels of understanding of health information are a “significant barrier” to improving healthcare outcomes in the county.

It defines health literacy as “a person’s ability to access, understand, evaluate, and use health information to make informed decisions about their health and wellbeing”.

But the document noted around 30 per cent of adults aged 16 to 65 in Surrey fall below the threshold for health literacy, rising to 37 per cent in the worst-performing borough, Spelthorne.

The countywide number rises to 49 per cent in areas where numeracy is required.

“This means many adults in Surrey are reading at, or below, the level of an average nine-year-old,” the report reads, “This is a significant concern and highlights the need for continued focus and action to address health literacy across Surrey.”

People with poor health literacy will struggle to read or understand health-related information and know what action to take based on it, the document says.

“Low health literacy is also closely linked to educational disadvantage, deprivation, disability and poorer health outcomes,” it reads, “Improving the accessibility of health information and services is therefore an important lever for reducing health inequalities.”

People with bad health literacy are also more likely to go to hospital more and have depression, the report adds.

A health-literacy pilot programme called Clearer Care aims to combat this trend and help make health information and services clearer for Surrey residents.

It aims to achieve this through a mix of expert guidance and small grants to help Voluntary Community and Social Enterprise (VCSE) organisations deliver their own health literacy pilots.

The report says: “This is a small-scale pilot programme aimed at introducing and embedding health literacy across Surrey. While limited funding and a VCSE-led delivery model may constrain its immediate impact on wider system change, the programme provides an important opportunity to test approaches, generate learning and demonstrate impact.

“Findings will help inform future development, potential scaling and opportunities to embed health literacy more systematically across the system.”

James Moules Local Democracy Reporter

.

A doctor stock image (Credit: Pixabay


Epsom Hospital in top national league for car park charges

Epsom Hospital public car park

Epsom and St Helier parking among UK’s most expensive, study claims

Patients and visitors parking for more than eight hours at Epsom or St Helier Hospital face a £20 charge, placing the NHS trust among the most expensive in the country, according to newly published research.

The analysis by short-term lender Fast Loan UK compared the maximum daily parking charges advertised by NHS trusts on their websites.

It placed Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust joint seventh in its table, alongside Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Devon Partnership NHS Trust.

St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in Tooting was found to have the highest daily charge, at £30. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was second at £29, followed by University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust at £26.50.

The ten highest charges identified by the research were:

  1. St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – £30
  2. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust – £29
  3. University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust – £26.50
  4. Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust – £26
  5. York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – £22.50
  6. The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – £22
  7. Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust – £20
  8. Devon Partnership NHS Trust – £20
  9. Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust – £20
  10. Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – £19

The local charge is confirmed by the Epsom and St Helier hospitals’ published parking tariffs, which have applied since April 2025.

Parking is free for the first 20 minutes. Charges then rise from £3.50 for up to one hour to £6 for two hours, £8 for three hours, £10.50 for four hours and £18 for seven hours. A fixed daily rate of £20 applies to stays exceeding eight hours.

The trust says parking spaces are limited and encourages patients and visitors to use public transport or active travel where possible. Epsom Hospital has 252 spaces, including 32 disabled bays and six drop-off and pick-up spaces.

Several bus services stop at Epsom Hospital itself:

  • 166: Croydon – Purley – Chipstead – Banstead – Epsom – Epsom Hospital
  • 293: Morden – North Cheam – Ewell Village – Epsom – Epsom Hospital
  • 467: Kingston – Chessington – West Ewell – Epsom – Epsom Hospital
  • 408: Woodmansterne – Banstead – Epsom – Epsom Hospital – Ashtead – Leatherhead – Effingham
  • 479: Guildford – Fetcham – Leatherhead – Epsom Hospital – Epsom – Banstead – Chipstead
  • E5: West Ewell – Epsom – Epsom Hospital – Langley Vale
  • 516: Epsom – Ashtead – Leatherhead – Box Hill – Dorking
  • 623: Ashtead – Epsom Hospital – Epsom
  • 21: Crawley –  Dorking, Box Hill, Headley, Leatherhead, Ashtead, Epsom Hsopital – Epsom

Other services connect surrounding areas with Epsom town centre, from which the hospital is approximately a 15-minute walk:

  • 406: Kingston – Surbiton – Tolworth – Ewell – Epsom
  • 418: Kingston – Surbiton – Tolworth – West Ewell – Epsom town centre
  • E9: Epsom – West Ewell – Clarendon Park – Livingstone Park – Manor Park
  • E10: Epsom – Manor Park – Noble Park
  • E16: Epsom – Stoneleigh – Worcester Park – Ewell
  • 318: Burgh Heath – Banstead – Nork – Tattenham Corner – Epsom
  • S2: Epsom High Street to St Helier Station

Free hospital parking is available to Blue Badge holders. Outpatients attending hospital three or more times in the same week and parents staying overnight on paediatric wards also qualify for free parking.

Other concessions include a £3.50 ticket for outpatients whose appointment overruns by more than an hour and weekly tickets for dialysis and oncology patients and the immediate relatives of people receiving intensive, high-dependency, coronary, neonatal or end-of-life care.

The trust says all money raised from parking goes towards managing and maintaining its car parks, security, environmental and travel initiatives and its shuttle bus. Any remaining income is directed towards clinical services.

Fast Loan UK said its figures were collected from NHS trust websites in June 2026. Where a trust operated several sites with different tariffs, the comparison used its highest published charge for a standard 24-hour stay.

The research also reported that 33 NHS trusts in England offered free parking and that hospital parking was free in Scotland.

Sam Jones – Reporter

.

Related reports

Epsom Hospital’s multi-storey carpark wrong on many levels?

Epsom Hospital car park appeal

New hospital programme called “HS2 of hospitals”

Planning buses not missing them says Epsom’s MP

Taking a ride on Epsom’s new S2 bus

Image: Epsom Hospital public car park


Patient injuries quadruple in Surrey’s largest mental health trust area

Sabp Silverwood (Credit: Google Maps)

This article has been amended to include statistics relating to the total number of patient restraint incidents across the trust in the relevant timeframes, and to clarify this number is what the trust’s quote (par 7) refers to.

The number of patient injuries at Surrey’s largest mental health trust have risen since the opening of its new inpatient facility last year.

Data obtained through a freedom of information (FOI) request to Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SABP) found that the number of patient injuries across the county had more than quadrupled in the space of two years.

In the 2023/24 financial year, 92 service user injuries were reported across the trust, which shot up to 365 incidents in 2024/25 and 431 in 2025/26 – meaning more than one incident per day on average was reported in the most recent complete financial year.

A total of 141 incidents had been reported in the ongoing 2026/27 financial year at the time of the FOI response. 

In addition, the number of incidents in which patients were restrained also leapt to a five year high in the 2025/26 year. A total 1,287 incidents were recorded, up from 826 the previous year.

An SABP spokesperson stressed that not all patient injuries reported were related to restraint incidents. “The use of restrictive practice is a very complex area and reducing restrictive practices is a trust priority,” they said.

The spokesperson told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) that the sharp rise in reported restraint incidents was “due to the opening of Silverwood’s inpatient services last year”.

Silverwood, located in Chertsey, began admitting patients in February 2025 and was designed to help Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust’s work to care for acutely mentally ill people.

The facility boasts 64 ensuite bedrooms across four wards, and was established to replace the old Abraham Cowley Unit (ACU).

However, the trust’s FOI response did not declare the number of staff injuries in this same time period, as it would have exceeded the cost limit on requests as each record would have to be reviewed manually.

The FOI response also revealed major changes in the trust’s use of restraint against acutely ill patients, with the reported number of “prone” restraints – where a patient is forced face down on the ground – dropping to zero in compliance with recent laws.

The Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act 2018 was brought in to improve transparency in the use of such force in restraining patients, and contains guidance against the use of prone restraints.

Better known as Seni’s Law, it was implemented following the death of Olaseni “Seni” Lewis, who died in 2010 after being restrained at Bethlem Royal Hospital in Bromley.

While 20 prone restraint incidents were reported at the trust in the 2021/22 financial year, that number dropped into single figures for the following few years before reaching zero in 2025/26.

At the same time, the reported use of chemical restraints has risen substantially, with this jumping from 11 in 2022/23 to 830 in 2025/26 – and a further 333 in 2026/27 so far.

The SABP spokesperson added: “We record all cases when restrictive interventions are used in line with Seni’s Law, officially the Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act –  which was fully introduced in 2022.  

“It is also important to note that the number of recorded injuries may be caused by many reasons, the majority of which are not related to restraints.”

James Moules Local Democracy Reporter

.

Sabp Silverwood (Credit: Google Maps)


Accident in Leatherhead led to prosecution

iskate ratchet strap

An event structure company and its director have been fined after a worker suffered life-changing injuries. The worker sustained multiple back fractures, a punctured lung and a broken leg. An HSE investigation found the dismantling work had not been properly planned or carried out safely.

iSkate Limited employee, Natalie McCreith, 38, a former outdoor sports instructor, had worked for the company for 14 years when she was seriously injured while working at Beaverbrook Hotel & Golf Course Leatherhead, Surrey, on 26 June 2024.

Ms McCreith underwent an 11-hour operation, spent three months in hospital and she is still recovering following the incident.

During the dismantling of a steel beam temporary structure, a ratchet strap was being used to lower a steel beam weighing over 100kg. The ratchet strap was not designed for lifting or lowering loads and failed, causing the beam to fall onto Ms McCreith. She sustained multiple fractures to her back, a punctured lung and a broken leg.

Neil Munn, director of iSkate Limited, was on site at the time and made the decision to use the ratchet strap, instructing workers where to stand. He continued with the method even after Ms McCreith raised concerns about whether it was safe.

In a victim personal statement, Ms McCreith said:

“Since the accident, my life has been completely turned upside down it’s now the polar opposite of what it once was. I will never live the life I once had or be in a body that isn’t screaming at me all day, I wish I could turn back time.

“My family spent the journey from Liverpool to London thinking I was dead, they have had to watch someone they love go through agonising pain and continue to do so. I am not the person I once was, I can’t be everything I once was and for them this Journey also continues.”

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that iSkate Limited had failed to ensure that the dismantling of the internal steel frame was properly planned and carried out safely.

HSE provides guidance on structural stability during alteration, demolition and dismantling which states that demolition or dismantling arrangements should be written down before the work begins. This safe system of work may be in the form of a safety method statement identifying the sequence required to prevent accidental collapse of the structure.

iSkate Limited, of Norfolk House, Station Road, St Ives, Cambridgeshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 16(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, by virtue of Regulation 20(1). The company was fined £12,000 and ordered to pay £6,949 in costs at a hearing at Guildford Magistrates’ Court on 28 July 2026.

Neil Munn, director of iSkate Limited, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 37 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, by virtue of Regulation 16(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and Regulation 20(1). He received a community order with 75 hours of unpaid work to be completed.

Speaking after the hearing, HSE inspector Russell Beckett said: “Demolition and dismantling is a high-hazard work activity, but if the work is properly planned it can be carried out safely. This accident has had a devastating effect on Ms McCreith and could easily have been prevented had the right work equipment been used.”

Health and Safety Executive

Phoito: iskate ratchet strap


Epsom Council delivers shock rejection to defibrillator kiosk

Defibrillator Hub (Credit: JCDecaux)

Plans to install a communications kiosk including an advertising screen and defibrillator on Epsom High Street have been refused over concerns it would harm the character of the area.

The proposals would have seen the 2.63 metre tall structure placed on the high street pavement, for which the applicant was seeking both planning permission and advertising consent.

As well as holding a publicly available defibrillator in case of emergencies, the unit also would have offered free calls to landlines, free Wi-Fi and interactive wayfinding.

One side of the unit would have featured an LED advertising display, which planning documents describe as “equivalent to the size of display found on bus shelters”.

But the design was met with pushback from a number of residents, with several complaining about its potential impact on the high street conservation area.

One “frequent visitor” to the town wrote an objection to the advertising consent, calling it “ugly, obstructive and unnecessary advertisement hoarding with several cursory additions”.

In their refusal, Epsom and Ewell Borough Council planning officers wrote that kiosk “would create additional street clutter” and “would be excessive and out of character within the street scene”.

They also noted in their report that the council has received 14 similar applications in the past 18 months.

“If each proposal were to be granted approval, the council would have an excess of public payphones and defibrillators, notwithstanding facilities already in existence in the surrounding area,” officers wrote.

“These applications have been submitted over time by different companies, some of which are in very similar locations, which if all were to be granted would result in several similar structures being built within proximity of each other; resulting in over dominance and harm to the street character and visual amenity.” 

They added: “As a result of its unsatisfactory siting, design, scale and appearance, the proposed communication hub structure would create significant clutter on the street causing unacceptable visual harm to the wider character of the area.”

“The Planning Inspectorate has dismissed appeals at Epsom Gateway and Capital Square, agreeing with the council that the harm from the advertising screens outweighs the public benefits of including a defibrillator.

 “The health and wellbeing of residents is central to the council’s work.”

Defibrillators are currently placed at the following sites across Epsom & Ewell:

  • Market Place, Epsom.
  • Ebbisham Centre, Epsom Square, Epsom.
  • Town Hall (rear entrance).
  • Harold Bell Solicitors, 174 Kingston Road, Ewell.
  • St John’s Parish Centre, Station Approach, Stoneleigh.
  • Auriol Park Café, Salisbury Road, Worcester Park.
  • The Parade Dental Practice, 177 Kingston Road, Ewell.
  • Ruxley Chemist, Ruxley Lane, Ewell Court.
  • Horton Pharmacy, Pelman Way, Epsom.
  • Horton Country Park, Horton Lane, Epsom.
  • Londis Convenience Store, Hollymoor Lane, Epsom.
  • NISA Convenience Store, Ruxley Lane.

James Moules Local Democracy Reporter

Image: Epsom High Street site of intended Defibrillator Hub (Credit: JCDecaux)


NHS in Surrey prescribe AI solutions to diagnoses

Cartoon tells computer "About three times a night" computer states "Advise a prostate check"

Surrey NHS trusts are investing tens of thousands of pounds into artificial intelligence tools across clinical and administrative settings, the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) can reveal.

AI is being deployed across some of Surrey’s largest health trusts amid a worldwide scramble to harness the burgeoning new tech.

Freedom of Information responses to the LDRS have shown that AI-backed diagnostic tools, transcription softwares and phone systems are in use at hospitals across the county.

Chief Clinical Information Officer Dr Andrew Carne from Royal Surrey and Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts – which are among the trusts rolling out AI – told the LDRS: “We are proud to be at the forefront of implementing AI to benefit our patients, supporting our clinicians in the diagnosis of serious medical conditions such as cancer.”

Among the tools used at Royal Surrey County Hospital is Annalise AI, a diagnostic software designed to help with analysis of chest X-rays. The trust is spending £21,120 per year on this technology, which has passed a “robust” evaluation process. 

The trust has credited this tool with helping speed up lung cancer diagnoses, giving clinicians the chance to catch more cases as early as possible. It is used across several trusts that are part of the Surrey, Sussex and Frimley Imaging Network.

“These tools are designed to enhance, not replace, the expertise of our clinicians and are rigorously tested before being introduced into clinical practice,” Dr Carne explained.

“The use of AI in any of our processes is subject to robust internal governance and oversight and is implemented in accordance with NHS England guidance and processes.”

An evaluation at Royal Surrey is also ongoing for the use of OlySense, an AI tool engineered to help with gastrointestinal examinations. The trust has so far spent £93,432.96 for two OlySense.

Supplied by healthcare tech company Olympus Medical, it is intended to assist with polyp detection during colonoscopies. 

But the use of AI in healthcare goes beyond clinical settings, with trusts across Surrey also using the technology for administrative purposes.

Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust – the county’s main mental health provider – spends an estimated £65,000 per year on Limbic AI Chat Bot, which is designed to assist with the patient referral process. 

A spokesperson for the trust said: “Like other NHS organisations, we are exploring the use of AI as part of the NHS’s ’digital first’ policy. We are not using any patient-facing AI at the moment, but we expect to in the coming months. 

“Before deploying any new AI or other technology, we will have strong governance in place and be aligned with all national guidelines.”

Several trusts also use less medically-specific AI tools, such as Microsoft CoPilot – which was found to be used in all trusts that responded to the LDRS’ FOI requests.

Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust said it is using CoPilot for “clinical uses including meeting summarisation, document preparation” in its FOI response – with a pilot beginning in September 2025 and evaluation still ongoing.

Dr Deblina Bhattacharjee of the University of Bath’s computer science department told the LDRS that the use of AI in healthcare comes with a balance of pros and cons, with the easing of administrative tasks being the “obvious one”.

Assistance in diagnostics, such as the software used across the Surrey, Sussex and Frimley Imaging Network, is also another crucial area where AI use “has its positives”, Dr Bhattacharjee added.

However, she said that “the risks come from pace outrunning governance”, adding: “Clinical AI should remain a support for human decision making, with clear accountability in place before deployment rather than after.”

Surrey NHS Trusts approached by the LDRS insisted that stringent evaluation criteria are in place before any AI technology is rolled out.

“From my own experience, the projects that succeed are the ones where clinicians, patients and information governance teams are involved together,” Dr Bhattacharjee said.

James Moules Local Democracy Reporter


Epsom’s Love Me Love My Mind celebrates 20 years of community care

Helen Maguire addresses the 20th anniversary party of LMLMM

An Epsom charity which has supported thousands of people affected by mental health difficulties has celebrated its 20th anniversary.

Members, volunteers, friends and supporters of Love Me Love My Mind gathered at St Barnabas Church in Temple Road on Saturday 25th July for a buffet meal, raffle, dancing and anniversary celebration. Among those attending was Epsom and Ewell MP Helen Maguire.

The evening marked two decades since the charity’s Monday Drop-In began at St Barnabas in 2006. What started as a welcoming place where people could meet, talk and share refreshments has developed into an entirely volunteer-run charity promoting better understanding of mental health throughout Epsom and Ewell.

Today, Love Me Love My Mind seeks to break down stigma, offer friendship and encouragement to people experiencing mental health difficulties and their families, and direct people towards sources of further help. Its regular Monday Drop-In attracts around 30 to 40 people each week for refreshments, activities and a home-cooked meal. The charity also runs a Men’s Pit Stop group, peer support and community activities, as well as organising the annual Epsom Mental Health Week.

The anniversary exhibition placed the charity’s work within a much longer and sometimes painful chapter of Epsom’s history. From 1896 onwards, five large psychiatric hospitals—Long Grove, Horton, West Park, St Ebba’s and The Manor—were built around the town. By 1925 the “Epsom Cluster” formed what was described as the largest psychiatric facility in the world.

The hospitals provided employment, recreation, companionship and care, but their position on the edge of the town also reflected the isolation and stigma experienced by people with mental illness. St Barnabas developed particularly close links with Long Grove Hospital, while members of its congregation were involved with the Friends of Long Grove.

When the large hospitals were gradually closed under the policy of care in the community, many former patients were discharged into group homes around Epsom, including within St Barnabas parish. Some had lost the friendships and support networks they had known inside the hospitals.

A number began attending weekday services at St Barnabas. The then vicar, the Revd Michael Preston, offered coffee afterwards and listened to the life stories of those who came. The exhibition records that from this modest act of welcome grew “a very significant mental health community support project”.

The charity’s late founder, the Revd Susan Bull, subsequently researched the relationship between churches and people experiencing mental distress. Her study, Voices of the Voiceless: An evaluation of local church care for those in mental distress, examined what enabled St Barnabas to provide acceptance and hospitality at a time when fear and stigma remained widespread.

The anniversary also remembered the long-standing social divide between St Barnabas parish and more affluent parts of Epsom. Separated from the town centre by the railway embankment and reached through low bridges, the neighbourhood was historically home to many lower-paid hospital workers and successive communities arriving from other parts of Britain and overseas.

Against that background, Love Me Love My Mind has spent 20 years building a place in which people can find companionship, belonging and acceptance. The charity says its work over that period has supported thousands of people, promoted positive mental health and helped create a stronger and more connected community.

Saturday’s summer party was one of several events being held during the anniversary year. The charity thanked Direct Residential, Love Your Accountants, Park View Café, St Barnabas Church and the Rotary Club of Ewell for supporting the celebration.

Further information about Love Me Love My Mind, its activities, volunteering and donations is available at www.lovemelovemymind.org.uk.

Lionel Blackman

.

Photo: Helen Maguire MP addresses the 20th anniversary party of LMLMM

Related reports:

Warm places to go to in Epsom and Ewell – 8 January 2026

Epsom’s Love Me Love My Mind week of healing – 30 September 2024

Local community gathered at Horton Cemetery – 11 October 2023

Sue Bull – a special lady. An obituary – 1 March 2023

Mental Health Services in Epsom and Ewell – 30 June 2022

A Matter of Faith: St Barnabas Church – 24 March 2022